 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 การประชุมวิชาการศักยภาพและความพร้อมของอาจารย์มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์เกี่ยวกับอีเลิร์นนิ่ง (2010)ผู้แต่ง: Dr.Sutithep Siripipattanakul, Associate Professor , Dr.Panit Khemtong, Associate Professor , Dr.Kulkanit Rashainbunyawat, Associate Professor , Ms.Varataya THAMMAKITTIPOB, Associate Professor , Dr.Piyaphong Saisophon, Lecturer , Dr.Chintana Kanjanavisutt, Associate Professor , Dr.Juthamanee Sangsawang, Dr.Paitoon Srifa, Lecturer , การประชุมวิชาการ: |
 |
 หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : The Actual and Expected Morality of Kasetsart University Instructors) ผู้เขียน: Yupa Nanthachai สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf Abstract The purpose of this research was to study the actual and expected morality of Kasetsart University instructors with regard to their sexes and years of ages. Three hundred and sixty four Kasetsart instructors were stratified and random sampling to answer the questionnaires constructed by the researcher. The results were as follows :- 1. Majority of Kasetsart University instructors had high in actual and expected morality. 2. Both male and female instructors had similar actual and expected morality on “to abstain from sexual misconduct with students.” This similarity was also found between those with different years of ages (not over 40 years, V.S. 41-50 years). While the over 50 years of ages instructors had high on “to abstain from using academic works in the improper ways and to avoid working in other professions that make the students have less respect on the instructors.” 3. It was not found any difference between male and female instructors in the actual an expected morality, but it was found the difference between those with different years of ages. The instructors who were 50 years of ages had actual an expected morality higher than those who were 41-50 and not over 40 years of ages. |
|
หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : Student Rating of Instructors’ Effectiveness in Teaching at Ramkhamhaeng University ) ผู้เขียน:Tuanjai Ketsa สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf AbstractThe study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching efficiency of Ramkhamhaeng University instructors in five areas : 1) preparing course outline and evaluation. 2) technique of teaching. 3) responsibility in teaching. 4) relationship between instructors and students and 5) content. Fifty-three courses were first randomly selected from courses offered in second semester of academie year 1982, and 3,171 students were randomly selected from those attened those 53 courses. The instrument used in this study was a questionaire concerning the effectiveness of instruction. There were 32 questionaire items. The reliability of this questionaire was 0.89. It was found that the teaching efficiency in all five areas of Ramkhamhaeng University instructors were at the good level. The analysis showed that there was significant difference in teaching efficiency among instructors in seven faculties but there was no significant difference in teaching efficiency between instructors who taught courses for freshmen and those who taught courses for sophomore or higher levels. Further analyses done to compare student rating of instructor effectiveness in teaching showed that first year students rated instructor effectiveness higher than those who enrolled more than four years. It was also found that students who expected to get G grade in the final examination rated instructor effectiveness in teaching higher than students who expected to get P grade of F grade. |
|
|
 |