 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 ที่มา:Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agricultureหัวเรื่อง:- |
|
|
|
|
|
 หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : Farmers’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward Organic Vegetables Cultivation in Northeast Thailand) ผู้เขียน: Shimul Mondal, Theerachai Haitook, Suchint Simaraks สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf AbstractThe main purpose of this preliminary study was to assess farmers’ knowledge, attitude, and practices toward organic vegetable farming. A survey method through a face-to-face interview from a purposively selected simple random sample of 40 households using a semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from organic vegetables growers in Samsung, Khon Kaen province, Northeast Thailand. The findings showed that the knowledge levels of the respondents were low (55%) and medium (45%) with no high level respondents at all. The respondents’ answers on organic farming, especially pertaining to use of organic insecticides, herbicides and fertilizers, showed there is still some need for improvement: their attitude was not satisfactory in obtaining organic materials, there were difficulties in implementation, they considered there were less befits in it for them and they were still dependent on conventional practices, especially for pest and disease control. |
|
|
หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : Farming Systems Improvement of Rice-based Farms
in Huay Khan Lean Sub-district,
Ang Thong Province, Thailand) ผู้เขียน:Yuki MORITA,  นางเกศินี ปายะนันทน์, ศาสตราจารย์ , Buncha Somboonsuke, ดร.ประเดิม ฉ่ำใจ, รองศาสตราจารย์ สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf AbstractThe objectives of this research were to study the socio-economic characteristics of rice-based farm
households, to study current main agricultural production systems of rice-based farming systems, and to
identify selected bio-physical factors and socio-economic factors related to farm household income. The data
was collected by using interview schedules from 116 representatives of farm households in Huay Khan Lean
Sub-district, who had practiced rice farming integrating with other types of farming. The farm households
were selected by purposive sampling methods. Data analyses were done by using various statistical measures.
The findings revealed that there were 2 main types of rice-based farming systems in the study site.
The major type of rice-based farming systems was rice-livestock farming systems (50.0%). The types of
livestock raised were chicken (37.9%), swine (29.3%), frog (24.1%), duck (5.2%), beef cattle (1.7%) and
chicken and swine (1.7%). The second major type was rice-fruit (mango) farming systems (24.1%). In
agricultural production systems, rice farming was similarly practiced in rice-livestock and rice-fruit farming
systems. On the average, farm households held 25.3 rai (rice-livestock) and 31.5 rai (rice-fruit) land, and
had 2.5 persons in farm labor. Irrigation were well facilitated, however, most of them cultivated both highyield
varieties and local varieties. Rice was directly seeded on rice fields with chemical applications. Harvested
rice was sold to local markets, provincial markets and agricultural cooperatives at the farm gate price of
3.15-3.96 baht/kg. The amount of production was 14,175 kg/year (rice-livestock) and 17,942 kg/year (ricefruit).
In livestock raising, all types of livestock are local breeds. Drug and vaccine were treated by most
farm households. Livestock were mainly sold to local merchants. In fruit farming, mango planting areas
accounted for 3.6 rai. Chemicals were also used. Mango was mainly sold to local merchants and local markets
at the farm gate price of 24.2 baht/kg. The amount of production was 860 kg/year. Rice-livestock farm
households gained a net income of 272,698 baht/year while rice-fruit farm households gained a net income
of 70,875 baht/year.
Hypothesis testing indicated that in the bio-physical factors, there was a significant relationship
between rice varieties and farm household income. In addition, in the socio-economic factors, there were
a significant relationship between age, occupational experience, farmer organizations' membership and
financial sources, and farm household income.
Based on the study, following recommendations are suggested: Firstly, implementation guidelines of
agricultural diversification program and sustainable agriculture should be developed in the provincial level
with regular monitoring and evaluating the activities. Secondly, effort should be made to make farmer
organizations attractive to be able to encourage membership among farm households by participatory
management approach. Thirdly, farm households need to be informed through workshops, discussions and
demonstrations on available resources to be sustainable. Fourthly, a network of the different organizations
including farmers' organization, the district agricultural office and the agricultural technology transfer center
should be developed to improve farming process. Lastly, farmers' capacity building should be done by using
model farms and giving awards to outstanding producers in terms of maximum utilization of resources through
integrated farming systems. |
 |