 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : Thailand's Foreign Policy-making Towards Myanmar Since 1988: The Reflection from the Business Sector's Roles) ผู้เขียน: ดร.ศุภกาญจน์ พงศ์ยี่หล้า, รองศาสตราจารย์ สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf AbstractThis paper examined the roles of Thai business sector on Thailand's policy towards Myanmar since 1988 and illustrated their bargaining power with the state and, to some extent, their networking with the state and the political sphere. From the study, it appeared that their roles in Thailand's foreign policy-making process and policy implementation derived from the mutual benefits between the state and the business sector. It is also found that the business sector monitored Thailand's bilateral economic relationship with Myanmar mainly through business associations, particularly, the Provincial Chambers of Commerce (PCC) in the border provinces and the Thai Chamber of Commerce (TCC), or the PCC top body through various means; state co-option, six PCC cooperative committees, JPPCC mechanism, direct participation in politics, and direct dialogue with the Myanmar authority. |
|
|
 |
|
ผลงานตีพิมพ์ในวารสารวิชาการEffect of triphenyl phosphate flame retardant on properties of arylamine-based polybenzoxazinesผู้แต่ง: Rimdusit, S., Thamprasom, N., Suppakarn, N., Jubsilp, C., Takeichi, T., Dr.Sunan Tiptipakorn, Associate Professor , วารสาร:  
|
|
|
หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : The Politics of Thai Silk during the Colonial Period to the Cold War Era) ผู้เขียน:ดร.ศุภกาญจน์ พงศ์ยี่หล้า, รองศาสตราจารย์ สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf AbstractThe Thai government's policy on silk promotion dates back to the reign of King Rama V with the political objective to balance colonial powers. After its failure, the promotion was thus short-lived. However, Thai silk promotion was again advocated by an ex-American CIA agent turned silk entrepreneur, Jim Thomson, and then by the Royal House in the Cold War period in order to cope with communist insurgency in the northeastern part of the country—the home of Thai silk production. Since then Thai silk, as a traditional livelihood, has been symbolized as a ‘Thai identity’ with success. Yet, the development of the Thai silk cottage industry is still limited as it has not been promoted and developed seriously. This article scrutinized the politics of the Thai silk development policy and the construction of Thai silk as a "Thai identity" and pointed out that it was political contexts that shaped the image and significance of the Thai silk industry while its silk cottage industry was left behind. |