Search Result of "Research productivity"

About 7 results
Img
Img

การประชุมวิชาการ

Spatial Analysis of Research-Productivity Nexus: A Case of Thai Rice Sector

ผู้แต่ง:ImgMs.Waleerat Suphannachart, Associate Professor,

การประชุมวิชาการ:

Img

ที่มา:วิทยาสารเกษตรศาสตร์ สาขา สังคมศาสตร์

หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : Factors Affecting Research Productivity of Faculty Members in Government Universities: Lisrel and Neural Network Analyses)

ผู้เขียน:ImgSageemas Na Wichian, ImgSuwimon Wongwanich, ImgSuchada Bowarnkitiwong

สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to study researcher?s characteristics, researchership, research competence and institutional support for research work as factors affecting research productivity, 2) to test for invariance of research productivity models across groups with size difference in Pedagogy Department, and 3) to compare the results of factors affecting research productivity using LISREL and Neural Network analyses. The sample consisted of 300 faculty members from 16 government universities. The research instruments were rating scales measuring research productivity, researchership, research competence and institutional supports for research work. The reliabilities of the instrument ranged from .76-.96. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, LISREL, and Neural Network Analyses. The major findings were: 1) The average of each faculty member?s research productivity was 0.40 research pieces per year; 2) Researchership and research competence were high in average, and institutional support for research work was moderate; 3) Research productivity model fitted well to empirical data (Chisquare= 80.007, p=0.132 df=67, GFI=0.963, AGFI=0.942, RMR=0.161). The test of model invariance across 2 groups of departments with different size indicated that the two models were invariant in form, but varied in loading and other parameters. The causal relationship using LISREL and Neural Network analyses suggested consistently that researcher characteristic, research competence, institutional support for research work and researchership had direct effects on research productivity; 4) The comparison of analyses with LISREL and Neural Network indicated similar results.

Article Info
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences -- formerly Kasetsart Journal (Social Sciences), Volume 030, Issue 1, Jan 09 - Apr 09, Page 67 - 78 |  PDF |  Page 

Img

ที่มา:วิทยาสารเกษตรศาสตร์ สาขา สังคมศาสตร์

หัวเรื่อง:ปัจจัยเชิงสาเหตุของผลิตภาพการวิจัยของนักการศึกษาสาขาอาชีวศึกษาในระดับอุดมศึกษา

ผู้เขียน:ImgApinya Hirunwong1, Imgดร.สุภาพ ฉัตราภรณ์, ผู้ช่วยศาสตราจารย์

สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to determine research productivity of vocational educators, causal relationship of factors influencing research productivity, and to develop the causal structural relationship model of research productivity. The proposed research productivity model consisted of 5 latent variables and 12 observed variables. The sample was 354 vocational educators in higher education institutions. The research instruments were a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview schedule. The statistics used for data analysis were descriptive statistics, t-test, three-way analysis of variance, factor analysis and path analysis. The research results indicated that: 1) average research productivity that measured by the number and quality of research within the last three years was relatively low (2.02). 2) Interaction of education, specialty and institution were not significantly different. Research productivity of educators holding higher degree was significantly more than research productivity of educators holding lower degree (p=.000). 3) The factor analysis indicated that personal factor consisted of research experience, time for research, research skill, research achievement motive and research habit; research environmental factor consisted of researcher collaboration, research climate, document and research fund (c2= 928.34, p=.000). 4) The causal structural relationship model was well fitted with empirical data (c2= 55.8, p=.18, GFI=0.92, AGFI=0.90, RMR=0.086, RMSEA=0.09). Factors of the model were personal factor, environmental factor, research attitude and research self-efficacy. The causal model could explain about 82 percent of the variance in research productivity. The personal factor contributed to the highest total effect on research productivity. Recommendations were proposed to encourage research productivity at three levels: personal, institutional and governmental.

Article Info
Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences -- formerly Kasetsart Journal (Social Sciences), Volume 026, Issue 1, Jan 05 - Jun 05, Page 72 - 81 |  PDF |  Page 

Img

Researcher

นางสาว กัณฑิมา เนียมโภคะ, ผู้ช่วยศาสตราจารย์

ที่ทำงาน:โรงเรียนสาธิตแห่งมหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ ศูนย์วิจัยและพัฒนาการศึกษา คณะศึกษาศาสตร์

สาขาที่สนใจ:พลศึกษา

Resume

Img
Img

Researcher

ดร. วารุณี ลัภนโชคดี, ผู้ช่วยศาสตราจารย์

ที่ทำงาน:ภาควิชาการศึกษา คณะศึกษาศาสตร์

สาขาที่สนใจ:สถิติ การวัดและประเมินผล การวิจัย ทางการศึกษา

Resume